Archive for September, 2006

Using a multiuser blog as a better forum

Friday, September 22nd, 2006

A member of the role-playing society (who shall not be named, though some people reading will know who I am talking about) recently tried to set up a SUCS account for the role-playing society for the purposes of making a forum. I have expressed my opinions of forums before on this blog, and will be referring to them here. I would be interested in setting up a forum for the RP soc, except for my reservations about web forums.

Essentially, my major complaint about web forums is their interface. phpBB will email you to tell you of new posts, but these emails do not contain the post’s content, and I assume they don’t contain appropriate headers to let your email client thread them properly. More critically, however, it’s not possible to post by email. Essentially, to interact with the forum I have to use a web browser, and web browsers are not well suited to content that updates irregularly. I want to do everything – read and post – within my email client. (A cynic would say that what I want is a mailing list. And they’d be right, except that I want people who want a forum to have one of those too.)

(more…)

Oh, the irony

Wednesday, September 20th, 2006

Mark Pilgrim’s recent rants about Creative Commons noncommercial licenses inspired me to read Lawrence Lessig’s Free Culture, which is linked from said rant.

I found an HTML e-book version of it, which is apparently more or less identical to the version published in book form. Right down to the copyright notices. Yup, it even says “Copyright © Lawrence Lessig, 2004. All rights reserved.” It is of course his copyright, but the second part is incorrect, because the book is licensed under CC-BY-NC, which allows noncommercial distribution provided you give the author credit. So his right to restrict distribution is not entirely reserved. It gives the other boilerplate copyright messages as well: “no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored … or transmitted … without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher of this book” (of course the CC license constitutes permission, so this clause has little effect and is rather misleading) and most laughable:


The scanning, uploading, and distribution of this book via the Internet or via any other means without the permission of the publisher is illegal and punishable by law. Please purchase only authorized electronic editions and do not participate in or encourage electronic piracy of copyrighted materials. Your support of the author’s rights is appreciated.


I’ve not read the book yet, but I gather it criticises the lack of creativity caused by the current draconian copyright regime and talks about alternatives, including CC. So the fact that it has a copyright notice of this sort strikes me as very, very bizarre.

Any fool can be a wizard

Wednesday, September 20th, 2006

Having received the shocking news that Elsmorian has never heard Tommy, I went back and listened to it again myself. While I was listening I read the Wikipedia article, which says “Townshend’s later interest in synthesizers is foreshadowed by the use of taped sounds played in reverse to give a whistling, chirping sound on ‘Amazing Journey’”. I thought “really? never noticed” and listened to it once more.

It’s funny when you revisit things you’ve listened to casually before and discover new depths. I only even noticed these funny chirpy sounds when I listened to them again just now, while they add a wonderful other-worldliness to the song, reinforcing the idea that it’s all a vision inside Tommy’s head. They sound great even today, but it was only when I realised how fantastic they must have sounded in 1969, when the album was released, that I could appreciate it properly. Bear in mind that I’ve been brought up in a musical culture where synthesisers are mundane (we call digital ones keyboards now) and sounds like that are trivial to create with the audio equivalent of the universal constructor, the waveform editor. I think it’s rather sad that my appreciation of it is jaded by having heard similar sounds hundreds of times before, as just another instrument.


It all reminded me of Terry Pratchett’s remarks about conjuring in his interview with Stephen Briggs in The Discworld Companion (my copy is the second edition), where he explains that he would probably enjoy a Discworld play, with its improvised, amateur special effects, more than a Discworld film, with big-budget CG:


I suppose I’m saying it’s the difference between magical tricks being done by a genuine wizard and by a stage conjuror. The wizard does marvellous things but it’s, well, magic and therefore in a sense mundane. Yawn yawn, he’s produced another damn pigeon, well, that’s magic for you. But when you know it’s being done by a conjuror with a hearing aid and a day job down at the building society, and all achieved by springs and elastic and secret pockets, this makes it much more interesting. Any fool can be a wizard, but you have to be clever to be a conjuror.

I think you can say the same for any look back at past innovations. It’s difficult to appreciate the cleverness of past inventors when the modern man looks at their inventions and shrugs — to him, they’re just a prosaic part of his world, no more amazing than a flint knife would have been to a caveman.