The "Urheimat" of Proto-Finno-Ugric, the hypothetical proto-language of the
modern Finno-Ugric languages, cannot be located with any certainty. The area
that lies in what is now central and northern European Russia (i.e., west of
the Ural mountains) is generally assumed as a likely candidate, at a time of
maybe the 3rd millennium BC. This is based on the linguistic migration theory,
which appears to suggest a "centre of gravity" somewhere around the middle
Volga River, and on reconstructed plant and animal names (notably including
spruce, Siberian pine, Siberian Fir, Siberian larch, brittle willow/elm, and
hedgehog). Reconstructed Proto-Finno-Ugric contains Indo-Iranian loanwords,
notably the words for "honeybee" and "honey", probably from the time when
Indo-Iranian tribes (such as Scythians and Sarmatians) inhabited the Eurasian
steppes.
|
Ði "Urheimat" ov Prøtø-Finø-Ügrik, ði haipoþetikl prøtø-langgwij ov ði modern
Finø-Ügrik langgwijes, kanot bi løkäted wið eni sertantie. Ði äria ðat laiz in
wot iz nau sentral and norðern Üropiean Rösya (i.e., west ov ði Üral mauntins)
iz jeneralie asümed az a laiklie kandidat, at a taim ov mäbie ði þird milenium
BK. Ðis iz bäsed on ði linggwistik maigrätyon þieorie, wic apirz to söjest a
"senter ov gravitie" sömwär araund ði midl Volga River, and on riekonströkted
plaant and animal näms (nøtablie inkluuding spruus, Saibieryan pain, Saibieryan
fir, Saibieryan larc, britl wilø/elm, and hejhog). Riekonströkted
Prøtø-Finø-Ügrik kontänz Indø-Iränyan lønwords, nøtablie ði words for "höniebie"
and "hönie", probablie from ði time wen Indø-Iränyan traibs (söc az Siðyans and
Sarmäsyans) inhabited ði Ürasyan steps.
|
Dhi "Urheimat" ov Proutou-Finou-Yugrik, dhi haipothetikl proutou-langgwij ov dhi
modern Finou-Yugrik langgwijes, kanot bi loukaeted widh eni sertantie. Dhi aeria
dhat laiz in wot iz nau sentral and nordhern Yuropiean Roesya (i.e., west ov dhi
Yural mauntins) iz jeneralie asyumed az a laiklie kandidat, at a taim ov maebie
dhi third milenium BK. Dhis iz baesed on dhi linggwistik maigraetyon thieorie,
wic apirz to soejest a "senter ov gravitie" soemwaer araund dhi midl Volga
River, and on riekonstroekted plaant and animal naems (noutablie inkluuding
spruus, Saibieryan pain, Saibieryan fir, Saibieryan larc, britl wilou/elm, and
hejhog). Riekonstroekted Proutou-Finou-Yugrik kontaenz Indou-Iraenyan
lounwords, noutablie dhi words for "hoeniebie" and "hoenie", probablie from dhi
time wen Indou-Iraenyan traibs (soec az Sidhyans and Sarmaesyans) inhabited dhi
Yurasyan steps.
|
Di "Ur\.hAim%A:t @v "pr\@Ut@U"fIn@U"j}:gr\Ik- D@ %hAi.p@"TE.tI.kl= "pr\@U.t@U%l@N%gwId-\Z @v D@ "mQ.d_n= "fIn@U"j}:gr\Ik "l@N.gwI.d-\ZIz- k@"nQt bi l@U"kEit.Id wID Eni "s3:.t@n.ti- D@ "E:.r\i.@ D@? laiz In wQt Iz n{U "sEn.t-\Sr\5= @n "nO:.Dn= "j}:r\@%pi:@n "r\V.S@- ai.ji: wEst @v D@ "j}:.r\@5 "m{Un.tInz- Iz "d-\ZEn.r\@li: @s"j}:md @z @ "laI.kli: "k{n.dI.d@t @t @ taIm @v "mEi.bi: D@ T3:.d_} m@"lE.ni.@m bi:.kEi- DIs Iz bEist Qn D@ lIN."gwIs.tIk maI"gr\EI.S@n TI:r\i wIt-\S @"pI:z t@ s@"d-\ZEst @ "sEn.t@r\ @v gr\{.v@.ti: sVm.wE:.r\ @"r\{Un D@ "mI.d_l= "vQ5.g@ "r\I.v@ @n Qn %r\i:.kn="st-\Sr\Vk.tId pl
|
There is evidence that before the arrival of the Slavic speaking tribes to the
area of modern-day Russia, speakers of Finno-Ugric languages may have been
scattered across the whole area between the Urals and the Baltic Sea. This was
the distribution of the Comb Ceramic Culture, a stone age culture which appears
to have corresponded to the Finno-Ugric speaking populations,
c. 4200 BC–c. 2000 BC.
|
Ðer iz evidens ðat befor ði araivl ov ði Slaavik spieking traibs tu ði äria ov
modern-dä Rösya, spiekers ov Finø-Ügrik langgwijes mä hav bien skatered akros
ði høl äria betwien ði Ürals and ði Baaltik Sie. Ðis woz ði distribütyon ov ði
Køm Seramik Költür, a støn-äj költür wic apierz tu hav koresponded tu ði
Finø-Ügrik spieking popülätyons, c. 4200-2000 BK.
|
Dher iz evidens dhat befor dhi araivl ov dhi Slaavik spieking traibs tu dhi
aeria ov modern-dae Roesya, spiekers ov Finou-Yugrik langgwijes mae hav bien
skatered akros dhi houl aeria betwien dhi Yurals and dhi Baaltik Sie. Dhis woz
dhi distribyutyon ov dhi Koum Seramik Koeltyur, a stoun-aej koeltyur wic apierz
tu hav koresponded tu dhi Finou-Yugrik spieking popyulaetyons, c. 4200-2000 BK.
|
There have been attempts to relate the Finno-Ugric languages to the
Indo-European languages, but there are not enough similarities to link them with
any certainty. Similar inflectional endings exist, but whether or not they are
genetically related is not resolvable. A common lexicon not attestable to
borrowing is thin, and no sound laws are established. Conversely, there have
been suggestions that the Germanic languages evolved from an Indo-European
language such as Celtic imposed on a Finnic substrate, but no satisfactory proof
yet exists.
|
Ðer hav bien atempts tu relät ði Finø-Ügrik langgwijes tu ði Indø-Üropiean
langgwijes, böt ðer ar not enöf similarities tu link ðem wið enie sertantie.
Similar inflektyonal endings ekzist, böt weðer or not ðä ar jenetikalie reläted
iz not resolvabl. A komon leksikon not atestabl tu borøing iz þin, and nø saund
loos ar establixed. Konverslie, ðer hav bien söjestyons ðat ði Jermanik
langgwijes evolved from an Indø-Üropiean langgwij söc az Keltik impøzed on a
Finik söbsträt, böt nø satisfaktorie pruuf yet ekzists.
|
Dher hav bien atempts tu relaet dhi Finou-Yugrik langgwijes tu dhi Indou-
Yuropiean langgwijes, boet dher ar not enoef similarities tu link dhem widh enie
sertantie. Similar inflektyonal endings ekzist, boet wedher or not dhae ar
jenetikalie relaeted iz not resolvabl. A komon leksikon not atestabl tu borouing
iz thin, and nou saund loos ar establixed. Konverslie, dher hav bien soejestyons
dhat dhi Jermanik langgwijes evolved from an Indou-Yuropiean langgwij soec az
Keltik impouzed on a Finik soebstraet, boet nou satisfaktorie pruuf yet ekzists.
|
A portion of the Baltic-Finnic lexicon is not shared with the remaining
Finno-Ugric languages and may be due to a pre-Finnic substrate, which may
coincide in part with the substrate of the Indo-European Baltic languages. As
far as the Sami (Lappic) languages are concerned, a hypothesis has been advanced
that the ancestors of the Sami originally spoke a different language, but
adopted their current tongue under the pressure of their Finnic-speaking
neighbours.
|
A portyon ov ði Baaltik-Finik leksikon iz not xäred wið ði remäning Finø-Ügrik
langgwijes and mä bi dü tu a prie-Finik söbsträt, wic mä køinsaid in part wið
ði söbsträt ov ði Indø-Üropiean Baaltik langgwijes. Az far az ði Saami (Lapik)
langgwijes ar konserned, a haipoþesis haz bien advaansed ðat ði ansestors ov ði
Saami orijinalie spøk a diferent langgwij, böt adopted ðär körent töng önder ði
presyur ov ðär Finik-spieking näburs.
|
A portyon ov dhi Baaltik-Finik leksikon iz not xaered widh dhi remaening Finou-
Yugrik langgwijes and mae bi dyu tu a prie-Finik soebstraet, wic mae kouinsaid
in part widh dhi soebstraet ov dhi Indou-Yuropiean Baaltik langgwijes. Az far az
dhi Saami (Lapik) langgwijes ar konserned, a haipothesis haz bien advaansed dhat
dhi ansestors ov dhi Saami orijinalie spouk a diferent langgwij, boet adopted
dhaer koerent toeng oender dhi presyur ov dhaer Finik-spieking naeburs.
|
According to data obtained in several representative studies on the genes of
Europeans, strong presence of genetic lines which can be associated with the
modern Finnic-speaking peoples are found throughout northern Europe from the
British Isles to the Ural area.
|
Akording tu däta obtäned in sevral reprezentativ stödies on ði jiens ov
Üropieans, strong prezens of jenetik lains wic kan bi asøsiäted wið ði modern
Finik-spieking piepls ar faund þruuaut norðern Ürop from ði Britix Ails to ði
Üral äria.
|
Akording tu daeta obtaened in sevral reprezentativ stoedies on dhi jiens ov
Yuropieans, strong prezens of jenetik lains wic kan bi asousiaeted widh dhi
modern Finik-spieking piepls ar faund thruuaut nordhern Yurop from dhi Britix
Ails to dhi Yural aeria.
|
According to the interpretation of the geneticists who conducted the study, the
ancestors of modern Germanic and Slavic-speaking peoples were in fact largely
speakers of Finno-Ugric languages at some earlier time. Weak presence of the
genes which could associate them with, for example, the earliest Indo-European
peoples indicates that the Indo-European languages were taken over from more
advanced, but less numerous, newcomers as a part of "cultural package" at the
time of the Neolithic Revolution - shift from gathering to agriculture. Thus,
the Finno-Ugric languages and their modern speakers do not originate in the
area near the Ural mountains, but rather likely were one of the three indigenous
European ethnic groups, which together provided about 80% of modern European
genetic material. Proto-Finno-Ugric was perhaps the original language of
North-East Europe. Going back further in time, according to Kalevi Wiik, the
earliest Finno-Ugric speakers and their languages were likely to originate from
the territory of modern Ukraine (the so-called “Ukrainian refuge”) during the
last glacial period, when the whole of northern Europe was covered with ice.
|
Akording tu ði interpretätyon ov ði jenetisists hu kondökted ði stödie, ði
ansestors ov modern Jermanik and Slaavik-spieking piepls wer in fakt larjlie
spiekers ov Finø-Ügrik langgwijes at söm erlier taim. Wiek presens of ði jiens
wic köd asøsiät ðem wið, for eksaampl, ði erliest Indø-Üropiean piepls indicätz
ðat ði Indø-Üropiean langgwijes wer täken øver from mor advaansed, böt
les nümerös, nükömers az a part ov "költüral pakaj" at ði taim ov ði Nieoliþik
Revoluutyon - xift from gaðering tu agriköltür. Ðus, ði Finø-Ügrik langgwijes
and ðär modern spiekers du not orijinät in ði äria nier ði Üral mauntins, böt
raaðer laiklie wer wön ov ði þrie indijinös Üropiean jenetik matirial.
Protø-Finø-Ügrik woz perhaps ði orijinal langgwij of Norþ-Iest Ürop. Gøing bak
farðer in taim, akording tu Kalevi Wiik, ði erliest Finø-Ügrik spiekers and ðär
langgwijes wer laiklie tu orijinät from ði teritorie ov modern Ükrän (ði
so-kaaled "Ükränyan refüj") düring ði laast gläsyal pieriod, wen ði høl ov
norðern Ürop waz kövered wið ais.
|
Akording tu dhi interpretaetyon ov dhi jenetisists hu kondoekted dhi stoedie,
dhi ansestors ov modern Jermanik and Slaavik-spieking piepls wer in fakt larjlie
spiekers ov Finou-Yugrik langgwijes at soem erlier taim. Wiek presens of dhi
jiens wic koed asousiaet dhem widh, for eksaampl, dhi erliest Indou-Yuropiean
piepls indicaetz dhat dhi Indou-Yuropiean langgwijes wer taeken ouver from mor
advaansed, boet les nyumeroes, nyukoemers az a part ov "koeltyural pakaj" at dhi
taim ov dhi Nieolithik Revoluutyon - xift from gadhering tu agrikoeltyur. Dhus,
dhi Finou-Yugrik langgwijes and dhaer modern spiekers du not orijinaet in dhi
aeria nier dhi Yural mauntins, boet raadher laiklie wer woen ov dhi thrie
indijinoes Yuropiean jenetik matirial. Protou-Finou-Yugrik woz perhaps dhi
orijinal langgwij of North-Iest Yurop. Gouing bak fardher in taim, akording tu
Kalevi Wiik, dhi erliest Finou-Yugrik spiekers and dhaer langgwijes wer laiklie
tu orijinaet from dhi teritorie ov modern Yukraen (dhi so-kaaled "Yukraenyan
refyuj") dyuring dhi laast glaesyal pieriod, wen dhi houl ov nordhern Yurop waz
koevered widh ais.
|
It should be noted that genes do not necessarily correlate with languages, and
that many of the above interpretations given by geneticists are not accepted
by the majority of archaeologists and linguists, most of whom still put the
Finno-Ugric Urheimat in the central or northeastern part of European Russia or
the area of the Ural Mountains in Neolithic Europe, identifying it with the
Comb Ceramic culture. Wiik’s interpretation of Neolithic farmers as early
Indo-Europeans also contradicts the prevailing Kurgan hypothesis.
|
It xud bi nøted ðat jiens du not neseserilie korelät wið langgwijes, and ðat
menie ov ði aböv interpretätyons given bai jenetesists ar not aksepted bai ðe
majoritie ov arkieolojists and linggwists, møst ov hum stil pöt ði Finø-Ügrik
Urheimat in ði sentral or norþiestern part ov Üropiean Rusya or ði äria ov ði
Üral Mauntins in Nieoliþik Ürop, aidentifaiing it wið ði Køm Seramik költür.
Wiiks interpretätyon ov Nieoliþik farmers as erlie Indø-Üropieans aalsø
kontradikts ði preväling Kurgan haipoþesis.
|
It xud bi nouted dhat jiens du not neseserilie korelaet widh langgwijes, and
dhat menie ov dhi aboev interpretaetyons given bai jenetesists ar not aksepted
bai dhe majoritie ov arkieolojists and linggwists, moust ov hum stil poet dhi
Finou-Yugrik Urheimat in dhi sentral or northiestern part ov Yuropiean Rusya or
dhi aeria ov dhi Yural Mauntins in Nieolithik Yurop, aidentifaiing it widh dhi
Koum Seramik koeltyur. Wiiks interpretaetyon ov Nieolithik farmers as erlie
Indou-Yuropieans aalsou kontradikts dhi prevaeling Kurgan haipothesis.
|
Wiik's theories have strong opposition in traditional linguistics. Many see his
theories as unscientific.
|
Wiiks þieories hav strong opøzityon in tradixonal linggwistiks. Menie sie hiz
þieories az unsaientifik.
|
Wiiks thieories hav strong opouzityon in tradixonal linggwistiks. Menie sie hiz
thieories az unsaientifik.
|